I saw this Australian case in the press this week and was reminded of several cases where one party has decided to go on a spending spree following the decision to separate.
Unfortunately this can force the other spouse to take drastic action to freeze or preserve assets, which can only be done by a court application and forces litigation which may have otherwise been unnecessary.
The court will look at unnecessary or exaggerated spending and if the conduct of the spender is behaviour that should have an impact on the division of assets. This is often argued when spending is linked to gambling, drinking, drugs or spending on a new partner or prostitute.
When it was put to him that his claimed post-separation spending spree was really a strategy to disguise the fact that he retained substantial cash, Mr Asher insisted he spent the money on services for “prostitution, prostitution, prostitution” which, he was keen to point out, were very expensive services